On feb 27, 2014 A Senate committee developed a revamped bill to require all private investigators in Colorado to acquire licenses. licensing will better protect clients against others who see it as a drag designed to kill small businesses and wipe-out part-time investigators. Denver.CbsLocal reports on the new bill would regulate private eyes.


Colorado lawmakers are hearing renewed debate over whether to join 44 other states in requiring private investigators to maintain state licenses.

Democratic Sen. Linda Newell has sponsored a measure that would mandate background checks and skills tests for people doing business as private eyes. This is the second year in a row Newell has raised such a proposal, saying the current system attracts unscrupulous investigators.

To protect consumers, the state requires plumbers, barbers and members of other trades to carry licenses, she told fellow lawmakers in a hearing last week. But “private investigation involves surveillance, investigation into people’s private lives, database searching,” she said.

“If any occupation merits licensing,” Newell asked, “shouldn’t this be one?”

Private detectives on both sides of the debate, meanwhile, vigorously argued their case.

Opponents said state licensure wouldn’t prevent dishonesty and fraud. Instead, they said, it would cause a hassle for private eyes who had done nothing wrong. Most of the state’s private detectives, they said, are retired law enforcement officers taking cases for small amounts of money who would close shop if required to pay license fees and pass a certification test.

“This cost, the rigmarole of going through it,” said Charles Evans, a private investigator from Castle Rock, is going to cause a lot of investigators “to fall out of the workforce.”

Ryan Johnston, a private investigator in Denver, supports regulation. He said it’s too easy to set up a private investigation business and access databases with sensitive information, including Social Security numbers.

To read this article in its entirety visit Denver.CBSLocal

Article Source: denver.cbslocal


15 Responses to New bill to regulate private investigators to maintain state licenses

  1. Thanks for posting this article, it is always good to understand what is going on as this crosses a fine line.

  2. Salma says:

    That is very interesting. I wonder what the law requires in Canada, where I live?

  3. Nick says:

    I guess that there needs to be something in place, but I have always thought about starting one up.

  4. The trouble with licensing is that it requires funds. But, that’s the way it is in society. Everything costs money, and might not even benefit anybody except those who collect the fee.

  5. I always thought that they needed licenses…

    Thanks for sharing! Good to know.

  6. Hmmm. Seems both sides have valid points. I don’t know too much about private investigating, though. I have a friend who is one, though – I will share this with him, he would like to read it, I’m sure.

  7. Katie Clark says:

    This is an interesting article. It’s difficult as I can see both sides.

  8. Very interesting article and learning about this law.

  9. Sounds like a difficult compromise.

  10. Caroline says:

    Interesting. I had no idea that PIs weren’t licensed. It makes sense to me that they would be even though I understand the logic behind both sides. Thanks for sharing!

  11. Priya says:

    Thank you for sharing. Interesting information.

  12. Great article. Thanks for posting. I hadn’t thought about PI’s *not* being licensed until this post. I understand both sides of this. At the end though, I think PI’s should be accountable for the information they have and should be held to the same standard as ‘companies’ do of data protection, etc… Thanks for sharing.

  13. Sophie Bowns says:

    This is really interesting!

  14. team-im.com says:

    Having read this I thougҺt іt wɑs extremely informative.
    ӏ apƿreciate you finding tɦе time аոd energy tօ put thiѕ informative article tοgether.
    ӏ once ɑgain fiոd myself personally spending ɑ lot of time both reading and posting comments.
    But so what, it ԝɑs ѕtill worth іt!

LOS ANGELES: Encino, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Woodland Hills, and Glendale       ANAHEIM: Santa Ana, Irvine, Newport Beach, Long Beach, and Pomona

SAN FRANCISCO: Santa Rosa, San Jose, Monterey, Concord, and Oakland  SAN DIEGO: Riverside, Chula Vista, El Cajon, Del Mar, and Oceanside

SACRAMENTO: Fresno , Modesto, Stockton, Vacaville, and Roseville       ARIZONA: Phoenix, Scottsdale

WASHINGTON: Seattle, Spokane

Copyright © 2013 Specialized Investigations. All Rights Reserved.